Were the Count's acts just? Based on the Count of Monte Cristo by Alexander Dumas. This includes a summary in it too.

Was There Any Justification to the librate of monte Cristos Acts of attend? Is it agreeable that an individual should have the right to destroy separate individual based only on the incident that they conceptualise that they deserve to suffer? This concept is known as sleeplessness troops justice. Is this type of action ever warranted? In The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas, one of the main themes is this concept of taking the law of nature into your own hands through revenge. Were the Counts actions towards the Villefort, Danglars, Caderousse, and Mondego families at all warrant? Or, did the Count take matters further than what should be acceptable in society? The Count of Monte Cristo revolves near a man named Edmond Dantes. Dantes leads what is considered to be a blessed life. He is a sheer 19 years old, about to be promoted to captain of the Pharaon, and has the applaud of a beautiful childlike muliebrity named Mercedes. Due to the fact that h e has gained so much at a young age, several individuals are jealous; viz. Danglars, Mondego, and Caderousse. To bondher, they conspire to get a plan to ruin Dantes future. They drop a line and send a letter to the authorities denouncing Dantes as a Bonaparte supporter.

During what is intend to be one of the happiest times of Dantes life, his conflict feast, soldiers barge in and haul Dantes away on an closure warrant. At the prison, Dantes meets with Villefort, the prosecutor. Villefort assures Dantes that he believes of his innocence, and burns the letter which was the only express to prove that Dantes is in fact, innocent. Then, contrary to his promise, Vi! llefort proceeds to send Dantes to the Chateau DIf, where he spends the next 14 years of his life. Unfortunately, at this time, Edmond... If you want to get a safe essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper